India wants to burn and Destroy the region

According to the bellow article writtern by Indian journalist, it can be considered as a very disasterous and mislead article. when RWI read it and expore into deep concern, we revealed that the author is a person who works for India and its strategies. Now India wants to collaps the power of revelutionaries in the region.

We thouroughly invite to you and advise to read this arlicle as a threat for all revolutinaries in the world. we must find out such this cases and must do against them as quickly as.

Nepalese Maoists, Islamists and South Asia
By Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury South Asia Fri, 25 Sep 2009

never ever give up in life, fight foward don´t give up. - By: johnny bampoh

Under the heavy influence of Maoists in the small Himalayan South Asian nation of Nepal, several significant things are happening both in political and social arena, thus drawing the attention of political pundist around the world, and especially South Asian nations, to start thinking, if such leftists in Nepal might have joined hands with Islamists, more precisely Al Qaeda, secretly, which would ultimately be a great threat to the peace and security of the region in particular and the world in general. According to analysts, Maoists in Nepal are gradually pushing the fate of the country towards a failed state.It was already reported several years back, that Al Qaeda has established a significant base in Nepal taking the advantage of huge mountaneous areas, where the Al Qaeda men could find easy places of hideout. It was even reported that, notorious terrorist Osama Bin laden made several secret trips to Nepal to give guidance and inspiration to his Jihadist cadres, who enjoy support from the Nepalese Maoist leftists.In the name of stopping explotation of women around 100 Maoist protesters staged a sit-in as the 2009 Miss Nepal beauty contest got under way in the capital Kathmandu on September 24, 2009 according to Nepalese police inspector Tul Bahadur Karki.The demonstrators blocked the road and shouted "down with Miss Nepal" and "stop the exploitation of women," but left voluntarily as the contest began, Karki said."Around 100 Maoist women staged a sit-in at the gate of where the beauty contest was being held," he said."The protesters left the scene as soon as the program started."The contest to select Nepal's candidate for the annual Miss World competition is being held under tight security after it was cancelled in 2008 by the former Maoist-led government, which branded it anti-women. Maoists formed a government last year after winning landmark elections, and lawmakers from the party later said they would not allow the Miss Nepal event to take place. But Maoist leader Pushpa Kamal Dahal - who goes by the name Prachanda - resigned as prime minister in May 2009 after just eight months in the job.Contestants for the Miss Nepal crown must impress the judges with a performance of traditional songs and dances, and are questioned on their ambitions and political views. But unlike Western beauty pageants, Miss Nepal does not have a swimsuit round. Contestants in the deeply conservative, majority - Hindu nation appear in traditional saris [A sari or saree or shari is a female garment in the Indian Subcontinent. A sari is a strip of unstitched cloth, ranging from four to nine metres in length that is draped over the body in various styles. The most common style is for the sari to be wrapped around the waist, with one end then draped over the shoulder baring the midriff].While, Maoist protest against Nepal's peasant contest is hitting most of the news media in the world, Pushpa Kamal Dahal [Prachanda], Maoist leader and former prime minister of Nepal, suddenly went on a fishy trip to the Chinese state of Hong Kong. He flew to Hong Kong on Sept 14, 2009 without prior announcement. According to his aide Manoj Thapa accompanying him, Prachanda attended a training session of the party cadres. "He is busy holding clandestine meetings shortly after arrival," Manoj told Kantipur online, a newspaper in Nepal declining to give further details.On the same day Vivek Gumaste, an Indian strategist, cautioned that Nepal Maoists are a threat to India. Maoists in India have close links with the comrades of Nepal. "They are waiting for the right moment and right circumstances to launch an armed bloody revolution in India via Nepal with the backing of China," wrote Gumaste for Indian popular newssite Redif News. Obviously, his apprehension is accentuated by a recent articles published in Global Times of China, which advocated break-up of India into 20 to 30 independent states.On the heels of it, Indian Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh frankly admitted the failure to combat the Maoist insurgents and said the militant violence is on the rise in many states. He told the conference of the Inspector Generals of Police from the states on September 22, 2009 that the Maoists have posed the gravest threat to the internal security of India.Dr. Singh's admission is the clearest signal yet of the government's concern at an insurgency that has virtually put a vast swathe of the countryside rich in minerals out of official control, hurting potential business worth billions of dollars. "Nepal has become one of the grounds for militant's infiltration into India," he said.Indian media reports say Maoists have spread in 20 out of 29 states of India with rapid expansion of areas under their control and rule. Thousands of paramilitary and elite forces were deployed along with state police two months ago in a campaign against the Maoist guerillas. But the government security forces suffered humiliation and casualties, estimated at about 800 over the last few months.Sharing his concerns, Indian Home Minister P. Chidambaram said the Maoists have increased attacks on railways, power and telecommunication networks to halt economic development. He was scheduled to visit Chhattisgarh, the citadel of the Maoists, in preparation of a fresh drive with redoubled strength. But he cancelled the trip apparently in view of the deteriorating situation. As the heavily Maoist-infested states of Chhattisgarh, Orissa, West Bengal, Jharkhand and Bihar are preparing for a fresh drive, the Maoists are also going ahead with fresh recruitment and intensive training in guerilla warfare, reports Redif News. They are supported by landless peasants, dalits and tribals and getting sympathy from a section of the intelligentsia. It is also reported that, in the name of anti-Indian notions, Nepalese maoists are indirectly serving the purpose of Al Qaeda in extending support to militants in Indian state of Kashmir as well some militancy groups in Bangladesh. Moreover, by shaking hands with Pakistani intelligence agency and administration in Beijing, Nepalese Maoists are continuing actions as per blue print of Islamabad and Beijing in destabilizing Indian thus ultimately causing great threat to India by giving instigations of various anti-Indian insurgency groups in Kashmir, North-Easter region etc.A completely Maoist Nepal poses a real security threat to India. Maoists on both sides of the border have close links and Nepal is increasingly facilitating anti-Indian activities.And in Nepal, anti-Indian sentiment is running high. Political parties and social organisations allege encroachment of large areas by India all along the 1,800 kilo meter porous border on the south. The government in Kathmandu is dubbed as puppet of India by the Nepalese people. New Delhi is accused of doing 'naked interference' in Nepali politics. Two Indian high priests of Kathmandu's Pashupatinath temple were recently assaulted evoking strong protest from New Delhi. Maoists demand Indian priests should be replaced by local priests. In this backdrop, Indian foreign secretary Nirupama Roy dashed to Kathmandu during end of September in a bid to assuage the grievances of Nepali people. She discussed with the government leaders the ways and means of blocking Maoist's return to power and warding off the rising Chinese influence on Nepal.Exile of Pakistan's Musharraf:In politics nothing is impossible and it is marvellous to see how couple of year makes sea-saw game in politics. President Pervez Musharraf ruled Pakistan almost nine years with an iron hand but now he is in exile in London.The General Musharraf finds himself in a city where he once banished his political rivals as Nawaz Sharif and late Benazir Bhutto. Musharraf stepped down on 18th August 2008 and was replaced by Asif Ali Zardari, a most controversial man in Pakista and the widower of slain former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, as the country's president.From the sprawling presidential palace of Islamabad to reportedly an unassuming three-bedroom apartment behind London's Arabic quarter in Edgware Road is a big fall of personal fortune for General Musharraf. The former military General reportedly bought the apartment with one million pounds. It includes a small study which contains mementoes of past. In London, Musharraf occasionally goes out for golf and is understood to host musical evenings at home with his close friends. Retirement has been unsettling experience for the former military General and it is a sobering change from the pomp of the former President's privileges. Gone are the legions of political acolytes; gone are the liveried soldiers who used to snap to attention and gone are the pomp and ceremony


In Islamabad Nawaz Sharif, the former Prime Minister whom the General ousted in a coup in 1999 is after him and Sharif wants him tried for treason, a charge that carries the death penalty. The army led by General Kayani opposes treason charge. So does President Asif Ali Zardari who fears it could upset fragile civilian-military relations. Nevertheless they consider it wiser if the General stays away from Pakistan.A criminal case has also been lodged in Islamabad and if convicted Musharraf might be in jail for three years. No wonder he moved from Islamabad to London sometime ago. The question is how long he will stay in Britain. The former ruler reportedly said "I am not in exile".Exile of Bangladesh's Moeen:Moeen U Ahmed, Bangladesh's former military chief and behind-the-scene ruler of the military controlled interim government, which ruled Bangladesh from January 11, 2007 to December 31, 2008, has already left Bangladesh for taking political asylum in any of the Western nations. Meanhile in Bangladesh, series of cases are already lodged against him for abuse of power as well reckless corruption by using the status of the army chief. General Moeen is also alleged for his extremely controversial role in combating mutiny inside the Bangladesh Riffles headquarters, which took place during February 25 and 26 this year.General Moeen, instead of sending army to combat mutiny, silently witnessed the entire episode, thus giving chance to the mutineers in killing large number of army officers, their family members as well abusing the female members of those army officers inside the huge area of Bangladesh Riffles in Dhaka.During the military controlled interim government, Moeen U Ahmed broke service rule and being the chief of army, he wrote political books and published it through a local publication company. The books, although claims to be his biography, was originally aimed at defaming the politicians and democratic system in Bangladesh.It is even revealed by now that, at the personal interest of General Moeen U Ahmed, both the top leaders of Bangladesh's main political parties were arrested and imprisoned without any legal ground. The present prime minister Sheikh Hasina and leader of the opposition Khaleda Zia although were arrested by Moeen's man with corruption charges, later both were released and Anti Corruption Commission, which served as pupet of General Moeen, later issued officials letters to both the leaders endorsing the fact that there was no evidence of any such corruption.Both Sheikh Hasina and Khaleda Zia were denied medical treatment in prison and large number of political leaders were arrested, harrased, humuliated and finally extorted by the military controlled regime under the directives of General Moeen u Ahmed. In one particular case, when a former junior minister was arrested and placed on remand for interrogation and taken inside Dhaka Cantonment, he was forced to open a bank account with Sonali bank [state owned bank in Bangladesh] and subsequently had to deposit TK. 70 million [US$ 1 million] in that account thus finally drawing the amount and handing it over to his interrogators, who were officers under command of General Moeen. It is also learnt that similar broad-day-light extortion was a regular phenomenon by the military controlled regime in Bangladesh during its entire rule.No doubt, General Moeen is fully aware of all such misdeeds committed by him or at his instruction since they captured power on January 11, 2007. And that is why, he is now on exile and trying to find any country to accord him asylum.
SALAH UDDIN SHOAIB CHOUDHURYJournalist, Columnist, Author & Peace ActivistSkype: shoaibnocaEditor & Publisher, Weekly Blitz www.weeklyblitz.netDirector, FORCEFIELD NFP PEN USA Freedom to Write Award 2005; AJC Moral Courage Award 2006Key to the Englewood City, NJ, USA [Highest Honor] 2007; Monaco Media Award, 2007

Is Nepal sliding back into the abyss?
By Bhagirath Yogi BBC Nepali service

Nepal is now entering what could be a dangerously uncertain phase
With the resignation of Maoist leader and Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal, popularly known as Prachanda, Nepal faces the gravest threat to its peace process since a ceasefire was agreed in the country's civil war in 2006.
As political parties squabble over how the army is run - with the Maoists wanting to dismiss the military commander and other parties insisting that he should remain - the country now stands at a crucial juncture.
There is a possibility Nepal could descend into chaos, with political infighting and instability preventing the smooth functioning of a constitutional democracy, as had been hailed after elections last year.
But analysts say the prospect of a return to full-scale violent conflict is still remote, as the Maoists have repeatedly said in the past that they will agree to play by the rules as outlined in the country's interim constitution.
Republic
The more likely outcome is that the Maoists will continue to remain a major political force in Nepal and work towards gaining strength in order to dictate future political developments.

The international community wants Nepal to be a model peace process
After signing the Comprehensive Peace Accord (CPA) in November 2006, the Maoists joined the interim legislature and entered into the Singha Durbar - the main seat of the government - by joining the cabinet led by then-Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala.
Once there, they successfully pressured the government to declare the country a republic, which was later made official by the first meeting of an elected constituent assembly.
The Maoists took part in constituent assembly elections of April 2008. They defied all predictions and emerged as the single largest party - though short of majority - in the 601-member assembly.
Maoist chairman Prachanda was appointed prime minister in August last year as head of a coalition government.
But his administration has courted controversy after controversy.
The most bitter of these erupted last month when Prachanda accused the head of the Nepali Army, Gen Rookmangad Katawal, of defying the government's orders.
The general, in his defence, said he was working under the guidelines of the interim constitution by refusing to recruit "indoctrinated" former Maoist rebels.
'Encircled'
The government, however, sacked him on Sunday saying that his explanation was not satisfactory. Nepal's latest crisis was precipitated.

Control of the army will be a key issue in the coming months
"The government is committed to establish civilian supremacy over the army and we are ready to quit if that doesn't happen," said Finance Minister Baburam Bhattarai, a senior Maoist leader.
Given this objective, what happens next?
In his televised address to the nation on Monday, Prachanda maintained that his government was "encircled" from all sides and was not allowed to function independently.
He also demanded that the existence of "parallel power centres" within the country must come to an end.
This tussle - as to who really pulls the levers of power in Nepal - will no doubt dominate the political landscape in the months ahead.
Prachanda is known to be deeply aggrieved over President Ram Baran Yadav's order that the army chief should stay put, despite the government's express desire to sack him.
Senior Maoist leaders have said they will now go to the general public to "expose designs against their government".
They have also warned that they may take to streets and play the role of opposition within the constituent assembly.
'High stakes'
The first outcome of the latest developments is likely to be a delay in the proposed rehabilitation and integration of around 19,000 ex-Maoist combatants who are living in various UN-monitored cantonments across the country.

Prachanda has only served as PM since elections in 2008
Prachanda had earlier said that the government wanted to conclude that process by July this year.
But that is not now going to happen, not least because the Army Integration Special Committee (AISC) - which comprises representatives from the Maoist party and the main opposition Nepali Congress party - has not yet even laid down the ground rules for proposed integration.
Equally difficult will be the target of drafting a new constitution by May 2010, the deadline set by the constituent assembly itself.
There are differences among the major political parties on key issues, including on the form of the next government - whether presidential or prime ministerial - and differences over how to divide the country into a federally-administered state.
Amid all the uncertainty, one thing is not in dispute. The stakes have never been so high for the Maoists.
Their main difficulty now will be how to retain their revolutionary credentials on the one hand while performing within the ambit of the interim constitution on the other. This constitution, after all, was drafted with their active participation.
Analysts say the Maoists have enough organisational strength to disrupt a government both within the parliament and on the streets. Their participation will be vital if a new constitution is ever to be drafted.
Similarly, the main challenge facing the major political parties - including the Nepali Congress and the CPN (UML) - will be to engage the Maoists and make sure that the journey from "bullet to ballot" is irreversible.
The international community too will no doubt be looking upon the latest developments with some concern.
They are eager to portray Nepal's peace process as a success story - a model which many other conflict-hit zones could follow.
But now they will no doubt be worried that template for peace is in danger of disintegrating.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8032569.stm

Prachandas’ Hong Kong visit controversy further deepen

Kathmandu, The bitterness between the India and Unified Communist Party of Nepal-Maoist has further widened following the Maoist Pushpa Kamal Dahal Prachanda’s recent Hong Kong visit.
India has suspected that Maoist chief Prachanda’s recent visit to Hong Kong was intended to meet with Chinese high ranking officials. However, neither the Maoist nor the Indian authorities have conformed the content of discussion during the meeting independently.
“India and China have been growing their influence in Nepal on different pretext. Both the Neighboring nation has been competing to bent the Nepali political parties on their fold” a diplomat argued that “Maoist, being a largest and immature in terms of diplomacy is now in verge to taste from the foreign powers.
India and China have not only been growing their concern but also competing with intent to make dependent Nepal on them said an official of foreign ministry preferring anonymity. According to him India has further suspected that Nepali Maoist would be used to fulfill the Chinese vested interest in Nepal and India as well.
The bitterness between the India and Maoist had begun following the allegation of Maoist of India’s hand on toppling the Maoist led coalition government. However, Maoist does not agree the India’s suspicion. It claimed that Prachanda’s Hong Kong visit was merely for addressing his supporters. Responding the controversy, Maoist party spokesman Dinanath Sharma had said that his visit was entirely personal and he had met his party’s supporters rather than others there.
According to an official of foreign ministry’s Chinese desk, India had raised its concern during the meeting of Maoist chairman Prachanda in Hong Kong. However, Prachanda had also dismissed the India’s suspicion just after completing his Hong Kong visit. Responding to the queries asked by media persons at Tribhuwan International Airport Prachanda had dismissed the India’s suspicion and reports that he met high-level officials from China in Hong Kong.

http://www.reviewnepal.com/more_news.php?id=1723

Prachanda warns of another revolution if deadlock persists

Nepal Maoist chief Prachanda has warned of another round of "decisive protests" soon, if political parties fail to break the political deadlock, prompting the government to ask them to be "sincere" to the peace process and not return to the path of violence.
CPN-Maoist chairman Prachanda said that attempts were being made to forge an agreement between the political parties but warned that the "people always possess the right to revolt" if no solution is reached on a national government by the upcoming festival of Deewali.
Prachanda said the UN would also support an uprising as the UN Charter has such provisions to uphold people's rights in case of civil rights violation, The Kathmandu Post said.
He, however, said that the nature of their uprising will be "peaceful".
Responding to the statement, Nepal Foreign Minister Sujata Koirala said the Maoists should be sincere to the peace process and not return to the path of violence.
"I don't think that the Maoists would be in a position to return to war," she said.
"The Maoists should help in the peace process and the process of drafting the constitution... The statement about launching another revolution is irrelevant talks," she said.
Speaking in the Chitawan district of central Nepal on Saturday, Prachanda had warned that his party would launch a "people's revolution" if their demands were not addressed by the coalition government.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/Prachanda-warns-of-another-revolution-if-deadlock-persists/H1-Article1-456021.aspx

90 per cent of Interference in Nepal comes from India: Mahara

In an exclusive interview with the Kantipur Daily dated September 20, 2009, Mr. Krishna Bahadur Mahara of the Unified Maoists’ party accepts that in the fresh visit of party Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal to Hong Kong, the Maoists’ team had met with some high placed China's leadership.
Say experts, the Maoist’s Party of Nepal that is sharing worst relations with India after the fall of the Maoists’ led government on May 4, 2009, the increasing hobnob with the Chinese regime of the Maoists’ leadership thereafter, and, of late Prachanda’s secret meeting with the Chinese leadership in Hong Kong has sent (it has already been sent) spine chilling waves to the coercive New Delhi leadership which unfortunately provided shelter to the leaders of the Maoists’ Party, including Mr. Mahara for over a decade. What an unjust world? Bear with it!
Mahara replying to a query posed by Kantipur says that Mrs. Nirupama Rao, the Indian Foreign Secretary while in Kathmandu had met with Dr. Babu Ram Bhattarai, the Maoists’ party vice chairman and her meet with Bhattarai meant that the Maoists party still accorded priority to the Indian establishment.
“What could show our respect to her than our vice chairman meeting her” Mahara asks.
Mahara, the international bureau chief of the Maoists party however, rejects the idea that the Maoists’ want enhanced relations with China at the cost of India.
“We have good relations with various political forces of India as well”, Mahara thus politely rubs ointment in the Indian wound.
“We feel that we must share enhanced relations with China as well, we are in the process of developing such relations with the northern neighbor...the practice has already begun", adds Mahara.
“Not just India and China, we must build cordial and friendly relations with other countries, beyond the countries in the neighborhood.”
“We are positive towards relations that Nepal shares with India”, he says adding, “But, we will never tolerate the Indian interference in Nepali politics.”
“Yes, our relations with India are slightly strained but not at that level as that could not be corrected", he continues.
Some Indian citizens are worried in having concluded that the Nepali Maoists did not come to their fold”, Mahara says forwarding a suggestion that “such mindset must be changed.”
“There is absolutely no space to criticize Chinese political interference in Nepal”, he says “as far as interference of India and China is concerned in Nepal affairs, the fact is that of the total, 90 per cent of political interference in Nepal originate from the Indian side”.
A daring declaration indeed.
Mahara honestly tells the Kantipur that “Chinese interference may only account to 10 per cent”.
“China is clear on its Nepal policy”, Mahara says, “The Chinese support is clear in that it comes through the proper channel of the Nepal Government.”2009-09-20 12:14:31

http://www.telegraphnepal.com/news_det.php?news_id=6330

Nepal is Near and Near for Final Revolution

This is given to Nepal historically and now it is resistible and inevitable rising up of Nepal Revolution.

We salute to Comrade Prachanda and his others

We are sure that they might have taken a good decistion for future. The world will trun its eye again to Nepal inforth coming days.

Whatever news spread in media, reallity is different. Truth and practice can be seen with work of their own.

Laal Salam

Are Nepal's Maoists a threat to India?
September 15, 2009 17:02 IST

There is more to it than meets the eye. It is not merely a squabble over custodial rights to the overflowing coffers of the Pashupatinath temple. Neither is it a dissension prompted by nationalistic sentiments. The attack on two Indian priests in Kathmandu, earlier this month, is in fact another facet of China's multi-pronged design to contain India by curbing its influence in Nepal with Nepali Maoists willingly acting as the front paw.
During Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal's recent visit to India (August 18-22) he remarked: 'Both our societies derive their fundamental social norms and values from a common pool of ancient wisdom and cultural heritage whose timelessness has been universally recognised. As the proud inheritors of one of the enlightened and ancient civilizations known to mankind, our two countries have much in common. These shared commonalities and the deep sense of social affinity subsisting between our two peoples since time immemorial need to be nurtured and consolidated further for our mutual benefit in the days ahead.'
Conscious of Nepal's newly anointed status as a secular state, Madhav Kumar Nepal appears to have deliberately refrained from mouthing the word 'Hindu' in describing the shared legacy of the two nations. Semantics, however, cannot deny the intrinsic nature of Indo-Nepali ties which is grounded in a common cultural and religious heritage that is basically Hindu in character; a bond that has remained indelible over the ages because of the privileged status of Hinduism in that country. The recent conversion of what was historically a Hindu kingdom into a secular state must be deemed as the first step of a grand communist design to erode Nepal's Hindu identity and weaken its fraternal ties with its predominantly Hindu neighbour.
But mere decrees rarely produce tangible results and the Maoists seem to be fully aware of that; hence the need for a direct physical assault on the sanctity of the Pashupatinath temple, the most prominent symbol of Hinduism in Nepal. Hindu temples imposing in their architecture and resplendent in their affluence have been a source of inspiration and strength to Hindu societies in the sub-continent through the ages. But their striking visibility has also made them easy targets for those who wished to weaken the fabric of these societies. Islamic invaders destroyed thousands of Hindu temples in order to crush the morale of locals in their unholy rampage across the subcontinent. The Pashupatinath temple episode represents a modern day avatar of this same intention albeit with a slight twist. In lieu of a direct destruction that modern times will not allow, unscrupulous detractors, read Maoists, have resorted to malicious interference in the traditional workings of the temple in order to gain control and eventually destroy this Hindu icon.
Baburam Bhattarai, the Nepali Maoist ideologue in an interview to the International Humanist and Ethical Union in August 2008 remarked: 'We are Materialists and Marxists and in a secular state we should be promoting scientific and atheistic values; not merely delinking religion and state. Today there are more religious channels and programs than any other on TV; programs glorifying the Ramayana [ Images ] and the Mahabharatha are amongst the most popular. Polluting the minds of the young is not what we need. Religion should find no place in school text books and public programs, we must discourage such kinds of beliefs and values, and then slowly religions will die out.'
Erasing Nepal's Hindu identity would facilitate the spread of Maoist ideology transforming Nepal into a Communist fiefdom ripe for exporting its virulent ideology across the border. A completely Maoist Nepal, a distinct possibility in the future, poses a real security threat to India. Nepali Maoists have had close links with radical Communist organisations in India since the early nineties and together they envision a 'red corridor' of Maoist control that stretches from Nepal in the north to Tamil Nadu in the south panning across the Indian states of Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Andhra Pradesh, Orissa and Madhya Pradesh [ Images ]. This swath of communist influence is referred to as the Compact Revolutionary Zone in Maoist literature.
What makes this scenario even more scary is China's new found love for the Nepali Maoists. After siding with the King Gyanendra in the early phases of the Maoist revolution, the Chinese have changed track and are firmly behind the Maoists today as they see in them a malleable via media to carry out their anti-India activities.
Completing an unholy troika of anti-Indian interests is an unlikely third player whose role may not be obvious: the Indian Communists particularly the Communist Party of India-Marxist. One must be wary of the CPI-M [ Images ] and its ideologue Sitaram Yechury's [ Images ] growing influence over the changes unfolding in Nepal. Under the guise of promoting democracy in Nepal, the CPI-M maybe orchestrating a far bigger gameplan that conceives bringing India into the gambit of an international camaraderie of communism through a bloody revolution with China acting as the 'friend, philosopher and guide' and Nepal being the access route.
At the outset this may seem farfetched or the fantasy of hare brained chauvinists. But close scrutiny tells a different story. The exponential growth of Naxalism in India specifically during the last five years is a cause for concern. In 2004, the Naxalite problem was confined to 156 of India's 602 districts. By 2008, Naxalites [ Images ] had expanded their reach into 180 districts or roughly one third of the nation's territory. Home ministry sources state that there were 1,509 Naxal-related incidents in 2006, 1,565 in 2007 and 1,591 in 2008. In 2009 with half the year still to go the number of Naxal related attacks stood at 1,128. Not only have the attacks increased in number but have become more daring as well. The capture of Lalgarh in West Bengal [ Images ] by the local Maoists was a flagrant exhibition of violent Communist power.
Interestingly this was the period when the CPI-M wielded great influence over the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance [ Images ] government at the Centre. Whether this upsurge in Naxalite activity was coincidental or consequential is open to question? Another factor providing impetus to Naxalism in India could have been the Maoist victory in Nepal.
Indian Communists have always subscribed to the notion of internationalism as opposed to nationalism, colluding with China and even blatantly endorsing China's viewpoint with regard to the Sino-Indian border dispute; a position the Communist Party of India maintained even during the difficult period of the war of 1962. Excerpts from declassified CIA documents titled Caesar, Esau and Polo papers released in 2007 throw light on the subversive tendencies of the united CPI during the late fifties and early sixties and clearly substantiate this anti-national attitude:
'In the midst of these dealings with the CPI left faction (read present day CPI-M) leaders, Peiping (Beijing [ Images ]) at the end of December is believed to have sent a formal party letter to CPI headquarters -- the only such message known to have been sent through official party channels after the Moscow [ Images ] Conference. Details on this Chinese message are sketchy although it was in large part concerned with the border issue. The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) expressed readiness to support any just struggles of the Indian people and expected the CPI to reciprocate on international issues of concern to Peiping (Beijing); the Indian party was particularly expected to oppose and expose the Indian bourgeoisie when the latter instigated border difficulties.
'Finally, a sharp battle was fought in the National Council (of the Communist Party) on the border issue, with inconclusive results. An effort by some of the rightist to secure an open condemnation of China was overwhelmingly defeated, and a subsequent attempt to obtain endorsement of the Indian case on the basis of the report of the Indian negotiating team was blunted.'
The CIA papers further indicate that the Communist Party's faith in parliamentary democracy was only skin deep and nothing more than subterfuge to buy time for an armed struggle, that was being clandestinely planned:.
'While the leftists (left faction of the CPI) were thus stalemated on the question
of national democracy, they were apparently successful in imparting a more militant and revolutionary tone to the meeting generally; in line with the earlier Soviet stipulation in Moscow, the National Council members were reported to have been generally agreed that a peaceful transition to power was possible only if preparations for an armed capability were made simultaneously. Jaipal Singh, the head of the secret CPI organisation in the Indian armed forces, was subsequently said to have been heartened by this new militant trend in the party and to have decided to reactivate his organisation in May 1961 following an expected victory of the left faction at the party congress.'
Eventually the dichotomy of views with regard to supporting China vis-à-vis the border dispute was an important factor that led to a split in the unified Communist Party with the left faction metamorphosing into the present day CPI-M. Most Naxalite groups are offshoots of the CPI-M. No distinction must be made between the Naxalites and the mainstream Communist parties that outwardly profess faith in Indian democracy for they are two sides of the same coin with possibly covert interaction.
One wonders whether the Communists in India are still at their old game: ostensibly nurturing democracy (in Nepal) but in reality waiting for the right moment and the right circumstances to launch an armed bloody revolution in India via Nepal with the backing of China. China has already made known its preference for the balkanisation of India using internal dissenting forces, the Communists being one of them. India needs to be cautious.

http://news.rediff.com/column/2009/sep/15/guest-are-nepal-maoists-a-threat-to-india.htm



Nepal Maoist chairman greeted by Chinese officials in HK

google_protectAndRun("render_ads.js::google_render_ad", google_handleError, google_render_ad);

TGW
Fresh reports coming from Hong Kong finally unveil the secret of Nepal Maoists’ Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal alias Prachanda’s sudden dash to the Special Administrative Region of China.
The Former Prime Minister of Nepal had left for Hong Kong for a three day trip on September 13, 2009.
The Maoists Party had declared that Prachanda in his short Hong Kong sojourn will attend a cadre training program.
Chairman Dahal is accompanied by his consort Sita Dahal, international bureau chief Krishna Bahadur Mahara and his close aide Manoj Thapa.
Be that as it may, as per the HK Nepal Online edition, Prachanda was greeted by the local Chinese High Ranking officials at the Hong King Airport itself.
“Dahal had a brief interaction with the local Maoists cadres who had arrived at the Hong Kong Airport but he was not in a mood to divulge the secret of his sudden dash even to his party cadres”, the report reveals.
He told the members of the Nepal Janaadhikar Sarokar Committee- a Maoists party affiliate that he will meet the local leaders only after September 15, 2009. However he did not divulge anything beyond this.
“We have no idea why he is in Hong Kong and who has invited him”, reports quote sources at Nepal’s Consulate office in Hong Kong.
The Chinese officials escorted the Maoists party chairman to a Hotel, a local vernacular daily reports here in Kathmandu.
Only recently the UML party chairman Jhala Nath Khanal had visited Hong Kong.
This adds significance to Prachanda’s fresh trip to Hong Kong.2009-09-15 08:37:33

Support Nepal Maoists

Photo by Mels: Revolutionaries Without Identity

Thousands of Maoist supporters protest in Nepal's capital against the president

Thousands of Maoist supporters rallied in Nepal's capital Friday, continuing their street protests against the president, whose refusal to dismiss the army chief led to the collapse of the previous Maoist-led government. About 15,000 people merged for a mass rally in the heart of Kathmandu, waving red flags and demanding "restoration of civilian supremacy." The former communist rebels call the decision to reinstate the army chief fired by the previous Maoist-led government as the fall of civilian power and the rise of military power. However, President Ram Baran Yadav, who officially commands Nepal's military, said at the time the ouster of the army chief by the Maoist government was unconstitutional. The army chief, Rookmangud Katawal, who retired early this week, opposed the integration of thousands of former Maoist fighters into the national army, which had been part of the peace deal with the rebels. The fighters are still in United Nations-monitored camps. It is unclear what the new army chief will do. Maoist leader Pushpa Kamal Dahal resigned as prime minister over the president's refusal to dismiss the army chief, and a new coalition government took over in May. "Until the civilian supremacy is restored, people will not be able to get their rights and democracy will not survive," Dahal told the crowd Friday. "The army should be under the control of the government elected by the people." The Maoist rebels laid down their arms three years ago to join a peace process and ultimately the political mainstream. They contested elections last year and emerged as the largest political party. http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5iddo2HuFxc2KxTBCVFJu4Ym4J8Sg

Thousands of supporters of Nepal's former Maoist rebels have held a rally in the capital Kathmandu against President Ram Baran Yadav.

The president's refusal to dismiss the country's army chief led to the collapse of the previous Maoist-led government in May this year. The Maoists accuse the president of undermining the authority of the civilian government. They say he wrongfully overruled the decision of the cabinet. Speaking at the rally, the Maoist leader and former Prime Minister, Prachanda, threatened to launch a popular movement unless the Maoists were allowed to form a national government again. The BBC's Joanna Jolly in Kathmandu says that many will see the rally as a calculated show of strength by the Maoists. Prachanda said his party was still committed to Nepal's peace process but that his supporters were prepared to fight if the current government did not allow the Maoists back into power. Our correspondent says that the Maoists want the issue of presidential power to be debated in parliament. But Nepal's current coalition government has refused to do this. The Maoists have said that as well as disrupting the workings of parliament they will continue to hold street rallies and protests until this demand is met. However in his speech Prachanda also said he was willing to give the government another chance to resolve the situation and find a way to let the Maoists work in coalition with Nepal's other political parties. Quotted from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8251287.stm

Inviting Comradly to all Revelutionaries in the world and join with us for working together

Please send your ideas and comments to form this organization. But no leaders, funds, office, and nothing. But we can do. BEGINING IS DIFFICULT


Objectives


Methodology


How to work

Networking

Priority